Monday, October 22, 2007

The Real Problem

Learn from your mistakes. We’re told this over and over our whole lives, so why shouldn’t it work for risk communication, right? It seems logical; however, it’s much more complicated than it sounds. An excerpt from Mad Cows and Mother’s Milk, by Leiss and Powell, entitled “A Diagnostic for Risk Communication Failures” addresses this very issue.

In researching the topic of flooding, I’ve attempted to come across some of these specific “failures.” Now, after reading about methods for the study of risk communication failures, I see where I went wrong. I failed to “track meticulously the media coverage of developing risk controversies.” It’s a great idea in theory - to reference newspaper and other media accounts, records of public hearings and the activities of public-interests groups. However, it seems to me that the only people who could attempt this comprehensive research are experts.

Do you have to be an expert in the field in order to be successful at fully understanding the issue? How do I, full-time employee by day and full-time student by night, attempt to overcome this challenge?

The text provides guidance in terms of questions to ask and information to gather:


What did the experts know and when did they know it?


What did members of the public know and when did they know it?

What effort, if any, did risk managers make to explain clearly to the public the

risk and benefit assessments they had conducted?

What effort, if any, did risk managers make to understand thoroughly the
nature of public concerns?

What events fueled public concern?

What was the nature of media reporting of relevant events?

As the public awareness of the issue was developing, did any agency seek
to take responsibility for the issue and to address the risk information gap?


These are great starting points, but the authors never dive deeper than theories. How can I realistically find the answers to these questions? This excerpt is less a “method” and more wishful thinking for researching in an ideal world where time and access are a nonissue.

Since we are on the outside looking in, it may be impossible for us to never know the answers. It's always overwhelming when we realize our own ignorance, but we can only make assumptions based upon the information we stumble across. Is that good enough?




Monday, October 8, 2007

Do Something About It!

According to the National Weather Service (NWS), flooding causes more damage in the United States than any other severe weather related event, an average of $4.6 billion a year in the past 20 years (1984-2003). What would you do if you couldn't get coverage under flood insurance?

The NWS posted the following question and answer on its website devoted to flood safety:
Q: Is there anything I can do to prepare for a flood?
How to reduce potential flood damage and what to include in a family disaster plan can
be obtained from the American Red Cross.

The NWS works with and relies on strategic partners involved in floodplain management, flood hazard mitigation, flood preparedness, and flood warnings to reduce the loss of life and property due to floods. Key partners include the U.S. Geological Survey, FEMA, the National Hydrologic Warning Council, the Association of State Floodplain Managers, the American Red Cross, the National Safety Council, the Federal Alliance for Safe Homes, The Weather Channel, and other media outlets, and many other government and private sector organizations.

The government seems to be the only organization with the power and money to actively help people prepare for and respond to flood emergencies. It can partner with other organizations to bring about action. However, this is the only response they have to the desperate cry for help. When the public asks, “What can I do?” the response from the most capable source should not be vague and uninformative, displacing responsibility elsewhere.

It is up to risk communicators to build upon existing resources and to make sure people are aware of them. In order for more effective communications to be developed, more research must be done to understand the target demographic. The previously mentioned government and nonprofit organizations must effectively combine their resources to create effective communication efforts.